UC Memory Disorders Center

234 Goodman Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45219 | (866) 941-UCNI (8264)

Memory Disorders Center Blog

Findings Suggest that Cognition in Alzheimer’s Disease May Be Amenable to Future Restorative Treatment Interventions

Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Widespread media coverage of findings reported in Science (published online 2/9/2012) by researchers at Case Western Reserve University has renewed attention and interest in the development of compounds that address the pathological changes that cause Alzheimer’s disease.

The two pathological hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease involve abnormal processing of the proteins amyloid and tau. In people who have Alzheimer’s disease, the body’s normal processing of the protein amyloid is not functioning correctly, leading to accumulation of the amyloid protein in the brain. This appears to be related to impaired clearance (removal), although some research has also identified overproduction of the more reactive (“sticky”) subtypes of the amyloid protein as playing a role as well.

The Case Western researchers reasoned that a molecule that might promote clearance of amyloid may have a beneficial effect in the disease pathogenesis. They used a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease that has been genetically modified to produce amyloid pathology in the brain that resembles the changes seen in humans. They administered a compound, bexarotene, that interacts with a retinoid-X receptor (RXR), with the hypothesis that this would increase clearance of amyloid in these mice. Their study was positive, demonstrating changes in the levels of both free and aggregated amyloid in the mouse brains. This finding was seen both in young mice and older mice, suggesting the effect may translate to more chronically deposited amyloid (although it should be noted that “older mice” are 11 months old).

Fascinatingly, the mice also exhibited behavioral changes when treated with the drug. There were improvements in a memory task, a fear-conditioning task following more chronic treatment. As featured in an article in the Wall Street Journal, treated mice appear to have exhibited behavioral changes related to nest building as well. Thus, both instrumental and complex behaviors appear to have been improved in those mice treated with bexarotene.

These are exciting findings. The behavioral changes provide a persuasive suggestion that cognition in Alzheimer’s disease may be amenable to future restorative treatment interventions. The study illustrates a new potential therapeutic target (namely the RXRs), which will certainly spur further research and increase our understanding of the pathological causes of Alzheimer’s disease. The compound, bexarotene, will certainly merit further investigation. As we have seen previously, test results in mice do not always correlate to a similar effect in humans, and further study of dosing, safety and side effects will be required before a clinical trial using this compound in humans would be appropriate. Nonetheless, this important research finding will advance our understanding of Alzheimer’s disease, drawing us one step closer to identifying effective treatment strategies and ultimately a cure.

-- Brendan Kelley, MD

The Protective Effects of Cognitive Reserve

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

Paris -- President Sarkozy addressed the international community of Alzheimer's disease researchers, clinicians and scientists today at the Alzheimer's Association International Conference. His speech highlighted France's commitment to addressing the clinical, social and research challenges posed by Alzheimer's disease. His ambitious program of federal funding, infrasucture and personnel support serves as an international model for a comprehensive approach to the needs of patients and caregivers affected by Alzheimer's disease. View the address >>

*  *  *

Cognitive reserve is a term typically applied to the protective effect that increased educational attainment, intellectual activity, social engagement, etc., have on the risk of developing Alzheimer's disease and dementia. Riccardo Marioni, PhD, of the University of Cambridge has performed a sophisticated statistical modeling using data from over 13,000 participants. In his analysis, higher educational attainment was associated with a decreased risk of mild cognitive impairment and an increased likelihood of reverting from mild cognitive impairment to normal; however, it was also associated with an increased rate of decline (from dementia to death in his model). The associations were the same for those who have a more complex mid-life occupation.

Social engagement associated differently. There was a decreased risk of converting from mild cognitive impairment to dementia. This could be interpereted as a slower decline to more severe dementia.

These first two findings seem to confirm the model of cognitive reserve. The latter finding emphasizes the important positive effects of remaining intellectually active and socially engaged throughout the lifespan.

Physical activity is widely recognized as reducing the risk of dementia and decreasing the risk of conversion from mild cognitive impairment to dementia. Marie-Noel Vercambre, PhD, of Harvard University presented results that demonstrated this benefit in a group of older women having known cardiovascular disease.

 

 

Could Falls be a Harbinger of Alzheimer's Disease?

Monday, July 18, 2011

Paris -- One of the most striking reports Sunday at the Alzheimer's Association International Conference demonstrated an increased risk of falls among patients who have biomarker evidence of Alzheimer's disease in a presymptomatic state.

This work was presented by Susan Stark, PhD, Washington University. Her report focused on non-demented research subjects as judged by assessment on the CDR scale. Although this 3-point scale has proven useful in staging dementia severity, it does not have adequate sensitivity to detect mild cognitive impairments. In these non-demented individuals, those having strong biomarker evidence of Alzheimer's disease (abnormal CSF markers plus brain amyloid imaging in the top 15 percent of all subjects) had a significantly increased risk of falls relative to those non-demented subjects who did not meet these biomarker criteria.

Based upon the biomarker signature, these individuals could be regarded as being on the cusp of developing clinical signs of Alzheimer's disease. This suggests that even before the development of dementia, these individuals had an increased risk of falls, which has obvious clinical importance. The work must be regarded as a preliminary finding. Cognitive data were not analyzed or considered, the number of patients meeting the restrictive biomarker endpoints was quite small (18 people), and the data related to signs of Parkinson's disease were not analyzed. Indeed, no data regarding gait were presented. Nonetheless, this finding emphasized the importance of examination of gait (walking) in patients suspected of having cognitive impairment. 

On Monday, Dutch researchers presented data demonstrating a correlation between fear of falling and cognitive impairment among 1,850 elderly Dutch persons, further highlighting the relationship between falls and cognitive difficulties. 

Aring Lecture: Could CSF Measurements Lead To Earlier Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease?

Monday, May 23, 2011

The week following the May 11 launch of the Memory Disorders Center was an exciting one. Continuing our recognition of the importance of Alzheimer’s disease, Dr. David Holtzman of Washington University in St. Louis joined us May 18 as the 25th Aring lecturer. The lecture is named in honor of Dr. Charles Aring, who founded the Department of Neurology at the University of Cincinnati and has attracted a long list of outstanding clinicians and researchers whose work has advanced our understanding of neurologic diseases.

Dr. Holtzman is a distinguished neurologist and neuroscientist who has published numerous papers over the last 22 years on the pathological and biochemical changes relevant to Alzheimer’s disease.  Much of his work has focused on the neurobiology of apoE and its relationship to amyloid proteins. His lab has also done work related to measuring levels of amyloid and tau proteins in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), which may serve as an indicator for the future development of Alzheimer’s disease. While a great deal of work remains to be done to validate the use of biomarkers such as CSF protein levels, this continues to be an exciting area of research.

Dr. Holtzman’s lecture provided an overview of his work in this area. He began by introducing the widely accepted hypothesis that pathological changes relevant to Alzheimer’s disease likely begin many years before a person develops symptoms. It would naturally follow that the success of interventions directed against amyloid would require identification of persons at a minimally symptomatic or even presymptomatic state. His laboratory’s work to develop CSF markers may provide such an advance. Much of the work in this area has focused on levels of a particularly “sticky” form of amyloid in the CSF (Aβ 1-42) and levels of the protein tau (which serves as a general marker of damage to neurons). This work suggested that the combination of low Aβ 1-42 and high tau provided a marker of amyloid deposition in the brain and that these CSF measurements could be predictive even before an animal developed symptoms related to the amyloid in the brain.

His laboratory team then turned its attention to replicating these findings in humans. They studied several hundred older adults with normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. The work suggests that measurement of CSF proteins may have a similar predictive value. However, while the accuracy of the prediction is reasonably good, improvements will be required before this technique could have widespread clinical applicability. Further, the desire to provide a screening test for Alzheimer’s disease would require the availability of a treatment that would slow or stop the pathological processes important to the progression of the disease. At this time, such a treatment intervention does not exist.

There has also been significant media attention regarding the ligand-bound PET scans, which are nuclear medicine scans that would allow imaging of amyloid in the brain. These types of scans are not currently available and have not yet been proven to have clinical utility. Dr. Holtzman’s lab has utilized this type of imaging to validate the findings from CSF protein measurements.

Pathological studies suggest that by the time a person is developing early Alzheimer’s disease, amyloid pathology has already been established in many regions of the brain. It remains controversial whether this amyloid protein is pathogenic in and of itself or whether it simply represents a marker of other pathological processes in the brain, such as inflammation, microvascular changes, or changes in the levels of chemical signals necessary to ensure the continued health of neurons. Scientific evidence from pathological studies, animal models of Alzheimer’s disease and basic cellular or biochemical studies exists to support both views. Future research trials of medications directed against different proposed pathological mechanisms will clarify which of these are relevant to the manifestations of Alzheimer’s disease in humans.

Dr. Holtzman has provided important advances in the field of Alzheimer’s disease research and will continue to do so. As discussed above, the two major research efforts focus upon early detection of those at risk for the disease and the development of compounds or interventions that slow or stop the pathological changes that cause the disease. The situation is completely analogous to medicine’s approach to high blood pressure, where the goal is to identify the condition and institute treatment before a person has a heart attack or stroke.

-- Brendan Kelley, MD

 

 

Aring Lecture, "New Methods to Assess Protein Metabolism" in Alzheimer's Disease, Available for CME Through May 31

Thursday, May 19, 2011

The 25TH Annual Aring Lecture, presented by UC's Department of Neurology, a UCNI affiliate, has been posted online and can be viewed for continuing medical education credits. David Holtzman, MD, Professor and Chairman of Neurology, Professor of Developmental Biology, and Associate Director of the Alzheimer's Disease Research Center at Washington University, gave the presentation, entited, "New methods to assess protein metabolism provide insights into Alzheimer’s Disease pathogenesis, diagnosis and Treatment," on Wednesday, May 18, 2011, at the UC's Medical Sciences Building.


In accordance with the ACCME Standards for Commercial Support, everyone in a position to control content for this course is required disclose to participants the existence of any financial interest/and or relationship(s) (e.g., paid speaker, employee, paid consultant on a board and/or committee for a commercial company) that could potentially affect the objectivity of his or her presentation or whose products or services may be mentioned during their presentation. The following disclosure was made:


David Holtzman, MD, speaker: Advisory Board: En Vivo, Satori, C2N Diagnostics, Innogenetics. Consultant: Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb Grant Recipient; Pfizer Eli Lilly Astra-Zeneca, and C2N Diagnostics


David Ficker, MD, Course Director: Speaker’s Bureau – UCB Pharma, Shire, Eiasi.


If you would like CME credit, please view the presentation and fill out the evaluation. Include your date of birth and last four digits of your social security number and return to Misty Wethington via e-mail at misty.wethington@uc.edu or by fax at 558-4305 no later than Tuesday, May 31, 2011 for credit. Individuals whose evaluations are received after May 31 will not receive CME credit.


View presentation >>


Download evaluation >>


 

New Guidelines Assist with Alzheimer's Diagnosis, Offer No Changes for Treatment

Monday, May 2, 2011

There has been significant interest and media attention surrounding the recommendations for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease published in April 2011. These guideline update the clinical criteria used for establishing a diagnosis of probable Alzheimer’s disease by incorporating the clinical and research experience gained over the past 27 years (since the previous recommendations had been published).


From a clinical standpoint, these changes reflect long-recognized shortcomings in the wording of the previous criteria. The revised criteria acknowledge that a small number of patients with Alzheimer’s disease may have “nonamnestic presentations,” in which memory deficit is not the most prominent difficulty, and they define what is meant by these presentations. The recommendations also delimit several non-Alzheimer’s dementias (e.g., vascular cognitive impairment, Lewy body disease). From a clinical standpoint, these recommendations provide a clearer guideline to establishing the diagnosis, but present no radical change to clinical practice.


The recommendations go on to discuss the incorporation of “biomarkers” in evaluation of possible and probable Alzheimer’s disease. The authors carefully state several times that these biomarkers are not recommended for clinical practice and that, “Much work lies ahead for validating the biomarker diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease.” Examples of biomarkers include measurements of proteins in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or ligand-bound PET scans. Clearly, biomarkers such as these (or some other technique, perhaps a magnetically bound particle that allows MRI identificaqtion of amyloid) would improve our ability to detect people at risk for developing Alzheimer’s disease at an asymptomatic or a minimally symptomatic state. In this context, they can provide tremendous value, and they would work in concert with medications that slow the pathological progression of Alzheimer’s disease. Unfortunately, both of these remain research aims, rather than established clinical practice, in 2011.


-- Brendan Kelley, MD, MS